2016+ Acura NSX Forum - Reply to Topic
Thread: How Slow Is The 2017 NSX? MotorTrend Finds Out... Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the 2016+ Acura NSX Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
12-16-2015 10:06 AM
Violee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadgetman View Post
For those who just prefer the 1st gen NSX, the solution is simple. Save some money and buy one of those. For those who are ok with change and current tech advances, the cost of admission will be more but accepted. And lastly, if you need to compare with the other labels... Get one of those. I have to wonder (as mentioned elsewhere) how many of the numerous complainers with "better ideas" of what should have been done, are/were really in market to buy one anyway?
You know it's funny. I've spoken to at least 5 current NSX owners over the last year at various shows and what not. They're all STOKED about the new car.

Couldn't tell you if they'll buy or not, but they're excited that Honda is doing it and doing it different.

This is what gets me about when people say where's the Honda of old. The Honda of old is still here they're still the same company driven by the same ethos, it's the market that's changed. Where's the market of old that not only demanded but gobbled up sportscar disguised as hatchbacks and 8,000 rpm redlines were unheard of at that price point.

We're in a different time a different market and this is how Honda approached New Sportscar eXperimental.

I'm genuinely excited. Porsche doesn't build a car like this at this price, nor does Ferrari, nor does McLaren, hmm but Honda does...

(I don't quite see what peoples problem is)
12-16-2015 08:37 AM
RedNSX Would Sport or Sport + be better for driving around curves but not on track?



12-15-2015 10:18 AM
|\|SX For the most part those modes are all about changing power delivery, power output, suspension tuning and even steering feel. Along with some more I might be missing on.



12-15-2015 08:27 AM
RedNSX I think comparing models and labels is a normal thing to do but ultimately, if you want the new NSx you're going to get it. Interested to hear what the difference between the Sport, Sport + and track modes are.



12-15-2015 08:14 AM
Gadgetman For those who just prefer the 1st gen NSX, the solution is simple. Save some money and buy one of those. For those who are ok with change and current tech advances, the cost of admission will be more but accepted. And lastly, if you need to compare with the other labels... Get one of those. I have to wonder (as mentioned elsewhere) how many of the numerous complainers with "better ideas" of what should have been done, are/were really in market to buy one anyway?
12-09-2015 10:17 AM
|\|SX
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastAndFurious View Post
The first NSX made Ferrari rethink their sports cars but will the new NSX do the same?
That doesn't need to be the case and shouldn't. Supercar market is growing and they can scoop up enough of the demand in the category they compete in. It's a good entry-level supercar. Some people who want a Ferrari ONLY want a Ferrari or things views as highly as it



12-09-2015 09:29 AM
Violee
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastAndFurious View Post
The first NSX made Ferrari rethink their sports cars but will the new NSX do the same?
is that the metric for what makes the nsx any good? because that's absurd.
12-09-2015 08:44 AM
FastAndFurious The first NSX made Ferrari rethink their sports cars but will the new NSX do the same?
12-08-2015 04:33 PM
nexus
Quote:
Originally Posted by |\|SX View Post
Yup. The only thing I think those crying have a valid point with is design. While I do like it, it could have more of a connection going on with original, being more original to acura all while still taking on design cues from the current line up.
Nonsense, no one is complaining that the current Mustang GT350 doesn't look like the '65. No one is complaining that the new Civic doesn't look like the old Civic...

Again I think much of that is just whining and complaining...

Acura scrapped their plans for the car at least twice, maybe 3 times in order to better tailor it to consumers, yet all consumers can do is complain... FFS.
12-08-2015 09:52 AM
|\|SX
Quote:
Originally Posted by nexus View Post
The whole thing is a satire of the whole "the new NSX isn't the old NSX" crying that goes on here and in every NSX article for the past year
Yup. The only thing I think those crying have a valid point with is design. While I do like it, it could have more of a connection going on with original, being more original to acura all while still taking on design cues from the current line up.



This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome